One
of the biggest things Manhattan taught me in my seven years living there is
that I can learn all kinds of things conversing with atheists about their
disbelief in God.
Thankfully,
I realized I only impaired my ability to really ÒhearÓ them by putting up basic
Christian defense mechanisms that, for me, were first developed in early
childhood as a missionary kid in the jungles of Ecuador who was taught by
missionaries from around the world.
Many
of the atheists I met in NYC—and, believe me, there are plenty of them
there!—turned out to be thoughtful, sensitive,
intelligent people who made it clear they had put a great deal of thought into
their convictions.
So,
when Jordan informed us in a sermon the other week about a magazine transcript
he found on the internet in which world-renowned atheist Christopher Hitchens is
interviewed by popular Unitarian minister Marilyn Sewell (for Portland Monthly Magazine), I knew I had
to read it.
*****
HereÕs
an excerpt that is truly classic for getting into the mind of Hitchens:
Sewell: In the book you write that, at age
nine, you experienced the ignorance of your scripture teacher Mrs. Watts and,
then later at 12, your headmaster tried to justify religion as a comfort when
facing death. It seems you were an intuitive atheist. But did you ever try
religion again?
Hitchens: I belong to what is a significant
minority of human beings: Those who are—as Pascal puts it in his PensŽes,
his great apology for Christianity—Òso made that they cannot believe.Ó As
many as 10 percent of is just never can bring themselves to take religion
seriously. And since people often defend religion as natural to humans (which I
wouldnÕt say it wasnÕt, by the way), the corollary holds too: there must be
respect for those who simply canÕt bring themselves to find meaning in phrases
like Òthe Holy Spirit.Ó
Sewell: Well, could it be that some people
are Òso madeÓ for faith. And you are so made for the intellectual life?
Hitchens: I donÕt have whatever it takes to
say things like Òthe grace of God.Ó All thatÕs white noise to me, not because
IÕm an intellectual. For many people, itÕs gibberish. Likewise, the idea that
the Koran was dictated by an archaic illiterate is a fantasy. As so far the
most highly evolved of the primates, we do seem in the majority to have a
tendency to worship, and to look for patterns that lead to supernatural
conclusions. Whereas, I think that there is no supernatural dimension whatever.
The natural world is quite wonderful enough. The more we know about it, the
much more wonderful it is than any supernatural proposition.
Sewell: The religion you cite in your book
is generally the fundamentalist faith of various kinds. IÕm a liberal
Christian, and I donÕt take the stories from the scripture literally. I donÕt
believe in the doctrine of atonement (that Jesus died for our sins, for
example). Do you make and distinction between fundamentalist faith and liberal
religion?
Hitchens: I would say that if you donÕt
believe that Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ and Messiah, and that he rose
again from the dead and by his sacrifice our sins are forgiven, youÕre really
not in any meaningful sense a Christian.
*****
Regarding
this last quote from Hitchens, Jordan reasons, ÒWhat a delicious irony that an
outspoken atheist grasps the central tenet of Christianity better than many
Christians do! What you believe about Jesus Christ really does make a
difference. Ó
While
Hitchens testifies he simply canÕt bring himself to find meaning in the term
ÒHoly Spirit,Ó and to him itÕs all Òwhite noiseÓ and Ògibberish,Ó the reality
of the Holy Spirit being one-third of the Trinity has absolutely EVERYTHING to
do with quality of life on the planet today, protecting even the most hard-core
atheists from pure hell on earth.
ÒWhen
you think about the Holy Spirit being here, thereÕs a difference between the Holy
Spirit being gone and the Body of Christ being gone,Ó explains Jordan. ÒThe Body
of Christ is what the Holy Spirit is forming today and thatÕs what restrains
the prophetic program today. After the Rapture, though, the Holy Spirit will be
here forming the Little Flock (of Jewish Believers) and His purpose will not be
to restrain the working of Ôthe man of sinÕ (the Anti-Christ). It will be to equip
the Believers in the Little Flock to endure through it. So, it isnÕt so much a
question of the Holy SpiritÕs presence or absence as it is the change in the
program.Ó
As
an old song, ÒThe Holy Spirit, Lord, Alone,Ó sums it up, ÒThe Holy Spirit,
Lord, can give the grace we need this hour; and while we wait, O Spirit, come
in sanctifying powÕr.Ó